Friday, July 13, 2007

Lactate Testing, Zinn and yet another Stroke & Stride

It only matters how fast you go when you pin your number on. – Neil Henderson on training easy and racing hard


Thursday was a busy day, to say the least.

Thursday I had an appointment with Neil Henderson of the Boulder Center for Sports Medicine to get a lactate profile done. I heard Tyler, Brett, Stu and the other Race Athlete crew members get theirs done and knew the BCSM was here in Boulder but I figured it would be expensive. Well, it wasn’t, and it was even cheaper as BTC member.

I’ve known for a long time that I had been doing the bulk of my running too hard and too fast and I had cut it back for that reason. The problem is, I wasn’t sure if I had cut it back far enough. Have I still been training too hard? Not hard enough? This was a question I couldn’t answer myself and I felt I needed an answer to. Normally the wait on testing is about a month, which was fine with me. When I called, I was in luck, someone had cancelled an appointment for a couple days from then.

I got to BCSM with my pedals and bike shoes and Paul got me all set up on the bike they use. There was a fan in front of me, a water bottle and towels, a TV set to VS. for le Tour de France and a whole bunch of machines on my right. The first was a computer giving a readout of everything that was going on with the bike. Watts, cadence, average cadence, gear ratio, speed, etc. That was about where my understanding of the equipment ended. I warmed up at 60 watts for 20 minutes and Paul took my blood by sticking my finger and drawing off the blood into a tiny little straw.

He then bumped the machine up by 20 watts and went to test the sample. Every four minutes after that Paul would bump the bike up 20 watts, stick my finger (the same finger each time, which was very sore by the end of the day) draw blood and test it. We stopped at 200 watts for a cool down and for Paul and Neal Henderson to start the analysis.

I finished, changed and showered in the locker room, then went to meet with Neal to discuss the data. Neal showed me a sample chart and explained what it all meant and how I could use the information to improve my training. Finally, Neal showed me my own chart.

To give an idea of where I’m coming from and how much I was over training, I have been doing most of my recent training running at 141-151bpm and cycling at 131-141bpm. This was what I was doing the vast amount of my work at. I had been running in the 150-160 range for a long time and cut it back to 141-151 based on a calculator I found on the internet.

Neal showed me my numbers and said that based on my results, he would guess I was training right here, and he pointed at the 135bpm area, which was pretty much dead on. That area is in my endurance zone, which sounds like a good thing at first, but as he explained it, it’s in a nether region that’s too hard to effectively build endurance and too easy to be of much use as speed work. There is a place for that level of training in a well built plan, but it’s not where the massive bulk of training should be done. Instead, close to 75% of my bike training should be in the 117-125bpm range, 15bpm lower than I was training (yikes!).

I asked how this data would translate to my running, especially since I had been running much longer than I had been biking. Typically, 8-12 beats difference would be standard, maybe 15 for someone who was a good runner and a new biker so I should be running at about 130-140 rather than the 141-151 I had been at and a far cry from the 150-160 I used to train with!

Most of the rest of the consultation was spent going over examples of athletes who train this way… Olympians, Xterra Champions, marathon legends, Tour de France cyclists… as Neal said, if there was a way to better train these athletes, he would use it and they would train with it, but there isn’t and the research and evidence all proves this is the way to go. Easily 75% of the people he sees train too hard, like I do. 10% or so of the people he sees train right because they have a smart coach or listened to someone they respect and the other ~15% train right because they’ve already been to see someone like him and finally got it through their heads. Slowing down is a difficult thing to do. It makes sense in my head that to race faster, I need to train faster. What I’m not thinking is that to race hard, I need to train easy. As he said and I quoted above, it only matters how fast you go when you pin your number on. If I’m racing my training runs, all I’m doing is shooting myself in the foot.

Test Results:
Watts : RPE : HR : Lactate (millimols)
60 : 2.5 : 110 : 1.33
80 : 3.0 : 115 : 1.26
100 : 3.0 : 120 : 1.63
120 : 3.5 : 125 : 1.77
140 : 4.0 : 134 : 1.99
160 : 5.0 : 145 : 3.09
180 : 6.5 : 153 : 4.50
200 : 8.5 : 160 : 6.63

My Lactate Threshold (LT) on the bike is 175watts/150bpm so my run LT is probably about 160-165bpm.
Recovery Pace 5-10% of weekly training
Bike <117bpm/90watts Run <127bpm
Overdistance Pace 50-75% of weekly training – Optimal Zone for base fitness, fatigue resistance and endurance
Bike 117-125bom/90-120watts Run 127-135bpm
Endurance 20-30% of weekly training – improves oxygen delivery and aerobic breakdown of carbs, fat and lactate
Bike 125-142bpm/120-155watts Run 135-152bpm
Tempo/LT 0-10% of weekly mileage – Improves ability to maintain high race pace
Tempo Bike 145-150bpm/165-175watts Run 152-162bpm
LT Bike 150-158bpm/175-190watts Run 162-170bpm
VO2Max 0-2% of weekly training – improves heart stroke voume and lactate clearance
Bike >159bpm/>195watts Run >170bpm

Zinn and the Art of Triathlon Bikes: Aerodynamics, Bike Fit, Speed Tuning and Maintenance
Colorado Multisport hosted a book launch party for Lennard Zinn’s new book. Zinn, I discovered, is a Boulder resident and does custom bike work, principally for taller bike riders www.zinncycles.com

It was a somewhat small event, very informal with snacks and drinks and, of course, the new book and Lennard. I spent some time talking with one of the marketers for the publisher, about triathlon, training and the kind of work he does as well as the guy who runs the bike frame manufacturing for Lennard. I don’t know much about bikes, hardly anything to be completely honest. I think part of what I love about running is the simplicity of it, while the complexity of bicycling has an appeal as well; it’s not something I’m familiar with yet. I also got a chance to talk with Lennard Zinn himself, though with my short breadth of cycling knowledge, I was mostly doing my best to be a good listener and learn as much as I could from what he said. I got a copy of his book, which he was gracious enough to sign as well and from what I’ve read so far, it has been very informative.

S&S #5
Before going to the Zinn event, there was the small matter of Stroke & Stride #5. Because I wanted to get to the Zinn event, I again did the 750m swim. It was a fairly unremarkable race although I had a nice duel the last 50-100m of the run with a guy who passed me. After he passed, I sped up to try and re-pass him, he turned briefly and saw me trying to catch him (I wasn’t more than a couple feet behind), and accelerated as well, causing me to try to step it up an additional notch with us both ultimately hitting it as hard as we could, which the crowd picked up on and gave us a nice cheer for our efforts. Unfortunately, I was not triumphant, but it was close and we congratulated each other, chests heaving to suck in oxygen.

My times were pretty much in line with last week, in fact, my swim time and transition time were exactly the same but I lost 15 seconds on the run. Next week I think I’m going to take the week off from the S&S. I’m not entirely sure yet, but I think this will be the week I take off, I feel slightly burnt out on the race so a week off seems smart.

Thursday, July 12, 2007

My First Ironman

One of my blog readers has insisted that the swim course for
S&S #3 wasn’t short so, faced with two differing opinions from two
perspectives that I respect and being the smart guy that I am I decided to look
at the data. I looked at the times for 3 racers other than myself for races 2,
3 and 4 (two of them didn’t do race #1) and the times for S&S #3 were
very much in line with their times for the other two events. This leads me to
believe that the course was correct which means my time of 16:34 on the swim
that day was valid and, if not impressive, at least exciting from my perspective.

I'm pooped, lots of news tomorrow!


Powered by ScribeFire.

Wednesday, July 11, 2007

My First Ironman & Websites I love... Pandora

My First Ironman – Chapter 1 Selecting a Race ADDENDUMI realized after I finished my reviews that I had looked at every IM North American race with the exception of Arizona. The reason for this is pretty simple, no one recommended Arizona for a first time IM race.It seems there are some fairly obvious reasons why, timing and conditions.IM AZ is held in mid-April, which means the bulk of your training is going to be in the winter and early spring. Not a great period to be training through if you’re in any kind of climate with a predilection for snow or ice such as Boulder, Cincinnati or Boston.Secondly, the conditions at IMAZ 2007 were reportedly borderline torturous, even for an IM. A wicked wind kicked up for much of the bike course and was practically sandblasting the pain off some bikes. Wind + Sand = BAD!Think I’m exaggerating? Take this excerpt from a story on Ironman.com thenhttp://www.ironman.com/columns/gruenfeld/lee-gruenfeld-recounts-a-record-setting-day-of-racing-in-tempeIt started sometime around noon with an unfortunate athlete serving out his three-minute penalty in a tent set up on the bike course. The official timer said, "Okay! Only ten seconds left! Ready? … four… three… two… one… Go!" Nothing. "Okay, go!" Zip. "Hey! You can go now! Penalty's over!" Nada. Couldn't get the guy to leave. About twenty minutes later another athlete came into the tent. The timer looked at his bib, then looked again. "Uh…you don't have a penalty." "Whatever," the athlete replied. "I'm going to serve one anyway." The conditions were so bad; racers were hiding out in the penalty tents to get away from it. When conditions are described as a cross between Twister and Sahara… well, that isn’t pretty.http://www.ironmanarizona.comEntering its third year, Ford Ironman Arizona has quickly become a top-rated event as some of the world's best Ironman triathletes converge on Tempe. The transition area, swim course and expo are all very close together, and thanks to the three-loop bike and run courses, race day viewing is nothing short of spectacular.Tempe Town Lake looks more like a river than a lake. It's relatively narrow, but is ready-made for a triathlon swim - spectators can follow the entire swim race by simply walking along the shore. While the water is very murky (you can barely see your hand in front of you), the cool water (about 64 degrees in 2005), is very pleasant to swim in!The three-loop - OK, three-loop-and-a-bit - bike course is surprisingly challenging thanks to the many (?) on the course that goes through the city of Tempe and in the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community located Northeast of the city.The run course here at Ironman Arizona is the highlight of the day for the competitors. A lot of the marathon runs alongside Tempe Town Lake. This has more-than-a-few upsides: the course is very spectator friendly, is cooler because of the proximity to the water, and is also quite scenic.

Websites I love… Pandora
http://www.pandora.com
This is a great website… First of all, it’s free. Nothing on the internet should cost money. Period. If you’re paying anything for internet services (aside from an internet connection) you’re paying too much. The good folks at Pandora have set up a website where you input the name of a song or an artist and the site uses information from the Music Genome Project to select similar music.
If I’m in the mood for something loud, I can type in Iron Man and get music with similar guitar riffs, vocals and themes to Black Sabbath’s Iron Man as well as, eventually, the song Iron Man. Right now it’s piping in War Pigs after kicking off with AC/DC’s “Let me put my love into you”. I’m no music aficionado, I don’t have enough interest to dig around or put together play lists of similar music, plus I hate the idea of paying for music, but equally dislike the idea of stealing it. Pandora is legal, it’s free, it’s always on and there is a ridiculous range of music. If I want Weird Al Yankovic, then I get Weird Al and a bunch of other musicians with similarly fun/goofy lyrics and beats (though there isn’t much out there that’s really similar to Weird Al). If I want jazz, blues or classical, I can type in Tchaikovsky, Beethoven or Cat Stevens and I get it along with other similar musicians.
Unlike most internet radio stations, if you want to step away from your desk, you can pause the player and come right back to the same spot. Listeners also have the ability to give a song thumbs up or thumbs down. If you give it thumbs down, it skips the current song. Thumbs up doesn’t do anything immediate, but the ratings, thumbs up and down, help teach the program what to play in the future.
The lone drawback is that you can’t take the music with you on an .mp3 player. Personally though, the only time I really listen to music is when I’m at work or sitting at my computer. I never listen during training or races (a huge no-no for many reasons that I won’t get into now) so it works great for me.

Monday, July 09, 2007

Off Day

Hip hip hooray for Off Days!


Powered by ScribeFire.

5430 Training Plan

For the 5430 Long Course Triathlon (half-iron distance. 1.2mile swim, 56 mile bike, 13.1 mile run) I'm using a training plan from Beginnertriathlete.com
Admittedly, I didn't look t a lot of plans (I probably should have looked at more) but I've been pretty satisfied with this one. It was recommended by several people and has fulfilled the three requirements I felt were necessary.
First of all, it fit my schedule. Some plans take up a lot more hours than others. Between work, research and trying to have something resembling a social life, I only had X number of hours to give each week and I didn't want to burn myself out.
Secondly, the insentiy and bulk of the workout seemed hefty enough that I felt confident that if I did the workouts, i would be in good shape for the 5430. While I didn't want to overtrain, having run several marathons, I didn't want to undertrain either. I wanted a plan that would leave me feeling confident come race morning and this one did that.
Third, the plan seemed to place a strong emphasis on the swim and the bike. I'm a stronger runner than a biker or swimmer, at least, I'm more familiar with running. So putting a strong emphasis on the swim and bike, two areas I was much less familiar with, was very important to me. Confidence and comfort on race day are huge factors in my opinion and I needed a boost more there than in my run.
The plan itself is 20 weeks long, 4 blocks of 4 weeks and&nbsp; 2 blocks of two weeks. The author, Scott Herrick of Alpine Multisport, has posted similar articles on preparing for everything from a sprint for beginners to a full ironman for beginners. he provides some benchmarks for whether you should undertake the plan or not. Scott recommends that you only do so if you can consistently swim 40min, run 60min and bike 90min and outlines the plan as something intended for the time-crunched beginner (like me).
Some ket notes, Scott left out any weight/strength sessions from the plans, believing that the time, for the time crunched triathlete, would be better spent on the bike, road or in the pool. I intended to add in some strength sessions, but rarely had the opportunity to do so effectively.
Each period included goals for Race Prep, Training, Nutrition, Mental Health and Efficiency
&nbsp;so that I wasn't just training, but training intelligently.
Each week had Weekly Goals outlined (sometimes in more detail than others) and a summary of total time spent on each discipline.
Each day of the plan specified a workout, a time or distance and an intensity level on the 1-10 RPE scale as well as tips or points of focus, such as working on fluid intake on the run or bike or practicing transitions from swim to bike.
Praise:
So far, the plan has been what I was looking for. It challenged and pushed me without overwhelming me or making me wonder if I would be able to finish the race or even the training cycle.
Critiques:
I don't have much to compare it to so it's hard to critique the plan. However, I think it would have been nice to have a little more running in the plan.
This is bearing in mind that I still have 5 weeks to my race. I may feel differently about things once the race is over and I'll probably address the plan again then.


Powered by ScribeFire.

Sunday, July 08, 2007

S&S3 and a Long Bike Ride

I never got the chance to discuss my S&S #3 times...

Swim: 17:04

Transition: 1:21 (5th best transition time for the 750!)

Run: 25:33

First of all, I cut a full minute off my swim of two weeks ago (I don’t count S&S #3 since it seems to have been a short course). I asked around and no one seems to think this was a short course, which is great. I sprinkled in some freestyle, just 5-6 short sets of ten breaths (all breathing to my left side) and did the rest breast stroke. It seems to have made a difference since I sent a new personal best by a solid minute. I may try and set up the intervals so they’re a little more organized (and gradually getting longer) in future races. As I was getting out of the water, one kid who was watching shouted, “way to be original, no wetsuit!” which was kind of cool.

The transition rocked. I set a personal best in 1:21 and had the 5th best T time for the 750. This was my first race with the bungee laces and I think they really saved me some time. I also didn’t put on my HR monitor, so that probably saved me some time. I’m going to set up my Transition next week so that I don’t put on anything other than my shoes and socks when I get out of the water. My HR monitor and singlet/jersey I’ll carry with me and put on as I dash to the run.

The run sucked. It was really hot and I didn’t bring a hat with me (stupid!). Considering that, I missed my personal best from last week by 30 seconds and it was still my second best time, so with the minute gained on the swim and 20-30 seconds from the transition, I really can’t complain.

Today:
Longest bike ride of the training plan... and ever for me actually. 68 miles... what a ride! I finished in 4:44, but that includes a 15 minute stop to help a fellow cyclist with a flat tire. The MS 150 was yesterday and today and one of the riders was alongside the road taking her wheel off. I asked if she needed help and, not surprisingly, she did. She developed a flat at some point. She didn't have a pump, didn't have any CO2 cannisters, or a spare tube. She had only one tire lever and had never changed a tire before. As it happens, I've known I needed to practice changing a tire so this was a great chance to help someone else and get some practice. I got the tube out and checked it but couldn't find&nbsp; a hole. The tire was still partly inflated and I couldn't force the air out anywhere. With no replacement tube and no hole to patch there wasn't a whole lot to do. Since there wasn't a hole and she didn't seem to know too much about maintaining a bike, it seemed entirely possible her tire had just been getting slowly lower over time and she never checked the pressure... *sigh*
Anyhow, I put her tube back on and used my CO2 cannister to reinflate her tire. It wasn't far to the next designated stop for the ride so if she had any further problems, she could deal with it there.
Since I gave up my only CO2 cannister I had to stop later at one of the local bike shops to get a new cannister. I also stopped to refill my water and Gatorade bottles which took another 10 minutes between the two stops.
All told, I'm pretty happy with the ride. I felt better than I expected to when it was done and got in a short 20 minute 'recovery' run when I was done. Considering I was doing the run with an additional 12 miles of biking on my legs I was really, really pleased.
I'm even more pleased that I have tomorrow off!


Powered by ScribeFire.

Thursday, July 05, 2007

My First Ironman

Another day, another Stroke & Stride…



Rumor has it last week’s course was short so any gains
I made on the swim were pretty artificial. I also have to wonder about my run
time since if the swim was shorter I was probably not as tired as I ought to
have been going into the run. Disappointing, but what can you do?



I had intended to bump up to the 1500 this week but this
week is the only week I actually registered for individually (not the 6 pack)
and I’m registered specifically for the 750. So, I’ll do one more
750, I’ve still got 4 races left in my 6 pack to work on the 1500. I’m
also supposed to do a 2 hour run today, which will have to wait until after the
S&S, so doing the shorter swim seems sensible from that perspective as
well. This is the first really long run that my training plan has called for in
quite a while, I’m actually pretty excited about it. Yesterday was just a
45 minute run with a 30 second sprint every 5 minutes. I didn’t bring my
HR monitor or footpod, I just wanted it to be a relaxing run and not think
about any numbers. To be honest, I rarely think about distance or speed except
in races but my HR I monitor a lot.



Thinking about my blog format, I think I’m going to
try and regularize the way I approach the blog to some degree. I’m going
to continue to post as often as I can about my training, but I’ll do a
weekly post on a subject that’s a little bit more in-depth, kind of like
the Race Hydration and Nutrition post I did earlier this week, but a little
more well researched.&nbsp; The My First Ironman post from yesterday will
probably become a semi-regular feature as well, but will be separate from the subject
posts.&nbsp; I’m going to shoot for Sunday evening/Monday mornings for
the weekly subject posts.&nbsp; The My First Ironman ones won’t have a
set date, they’ll just show up as I move step by step through the process
of choosing and training for my first Ironman.